Now, talking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that's normally employed for even ten percent of its possible.
What's it to get the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the person has secured his wrist into the max following a dip along with a few strokes, then return immediately to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their main use it is only the fault of old habits at least as much as the debut of the so-called divers of this contemporary age that dates back into the center of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the group can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that even non-fans will remember well one of the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are just two of the first cases that show how - fiction or reality - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day that the brands when it came to describing their models began to use the phrase: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most famous secret agent in the world, and obviously also the watch whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose roots would simply deal with here "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even when you have to wash the hands.
However, a true diver's watch has generally always had a lot to say technically speaking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving in the Persian website Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to ensure these performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the operation of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to certain rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal usage, that which we know is the best, the best sub may be in the end a watchable to offer features much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to simply immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even count on a screw-on crown, better still if protected on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this underwater timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on hardly any versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a closing but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a little 'of issues related to the time that must meet with the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've split them into two categories. The order in which they appear does not signify any position.